How To Deal With The Interviewer'S Step By Step

Many people have such an interview experience, the interviewer grabbed a problem step by step, follow up, interlocking and interlocking, even turning over and over, different angles and multiple angles to ask a question.

In the face of this interview, what should the interviewee respond to?

Why did the interviewer step by step?

As an interviewee, you should first understand why the interviewer is pressing hard.

First, this is the style of the interviewer and the need for recruitment.

Some interviewers have long established the interview style of pressing harder and harder.

Second, this is the interviewer judging the applicant's professional depth.

Some job people do not work in depth, know a general idea, or do not have strong thinking and summarizing ability, or work involvement is not deep. The interviewer deeply asks closely, and step by step, helps to understand the professional depth and depth of work of the interviewee.

This method of interview can really lay down those people who work hard at the job interview, and it is also a good test for those who have just participated in some of the work.

As workplace impetuosity becomes more and more serious, more people spend their time and energy on accumulating seniority, paying attention to their positions and salaries, so this step by step approach facilitates the interview of impetuous people.

Of course, this kind of interview method may be biased for those who are not good at expressing professional skills, but for non technical people.

Third, this is the interviewer's information for verification.

If the interviewee intentionally or unintentionally does not agree with the information known to the interviewer, the interviewer will step by step in order to prove it.

This is divided into three situations: the first is that the interviewee's slip of the tongue is wrong, and it is unintentional. The interviewer finds out in time and asks in time, hoping to get a deeper understanding of whether the interviewee is Mr. Nanguo.

The second way is to be bullshit by the interviewer and ask closely after the interviewer finds out.

The third is the fabrication of nothing.

In this case, if a professional interviewer is going to push hard,

Of course, there are other reasons why the interviewer is pressing harder.

To answer the question, we should make a concrete analysis of the specific situation and generalize it in five situations.

How to deal with the questioning caused by fraud?

For fake, we can not deal with it.

We must deal with it without cheating.

If your resume has been false, such as: education, experience, and job fraud, if the interviewer is pressing hard, please don't continue to fake it, simply truthfully surrender the weapon so as not to be embarrassed.

Faced with the interviewer's interrogation, the interviewee sometimes uses a false cover to cover up the previous one. The more masking the fake the bigger the more, the lie is a lie.

For example, there is an experience that is false. This section may have been in business for more than half a year and failed.

If the interviewer holds this period of time and finds loopholes, he might as well simply tell the truth, and the interviewer will not continue to pursue this experience.

If the interviewer continues to ask this question for more than half a year, you will reply reasonably.

So in the face of this situation, it is really replacing the fake, which is the only way to get the interviewer's understanding.

How to deal with the questioning caused by bragging?

What do you do when you blow your own hair?

Bragging is a habit. It is used to raise the level of facts to emphasize and highlight the key points. As a result, the interviewer grabbed and asked questions. What should I do?

It's very simple. Sorry, just tell the truth.

This is different from the previous fake, which is only a wrong order of magnitude.

For example, the annual sales per team of your team is 500 thousand, but when you talk about team size, you sometimes blurt out 400 people. In fact, you are less than 200 people. At this point, you doubled the size of the team, the total sales volume was 200 million, but actually less than 1 hundred million.

This kind of bragging is undesirable. At this point, the interviewer is likely to ask closely: there are several sales teams, other teams, the number of people, the level of sales ability, and the position of your company in the industry.

The cumulative result is far beyond the normal operating level of the industry.

In fact, the interviewer often has a general understanding of the industry, otherwise he will not become your interviewer.

Even if you don't understand, you'll get a general understanding in half an hour.

Therefore, if you have the habit of bragging, you should be cautious when facing the interviewer. If you are a little bit aggressive, you can easily be asked if it suddenly becomes bigger.

The best one is one or two is two, seeking truth from facts, so that my heart is steadfast, calm and normal.

Otherwise, he said he had risked himself and was asked to sweat nervously by the interviewer. A series of questions behind him were not answered well because of nervousness, which would lead to failure in the interview.

If you do not pay attention to it and find out that the interviewer is questioning himself and finding that he will not get round, the best way is to say sorry, just say something wrong, and correct the original data so that the interviewer will not ask himself.

And when the interviewer approves of his achievements and wisdom, he will appreciate your mistakes and make them feel strict and responsible.

How to deal with questions caused by slip of tongue?

If your own slip of the tongue is wrong, it will also lead the interviewer to catch up.

Once such an applicant, speaking of his office building responsible for the construction, a slip of the tongue, the floor height of 40 cm, the result of the interviewer gradually catch up, because a 68 storey office building, more than 27 meters, how many floors?

At that time, the applicant realized that he had made a mistake and wanted to change his mind. But when he thought of a senior manager who admitted his mistake and embarrassed, he was constantly pressed by the interviewer, and finally found that the famous office office that he was responsible for became the most expensive office building.

But I just said that I am very good at cost control management. At this time, I can not justify myself because of this slip of my tongue. I have made myself into a joke.

Of course, the boss interviewed later regretted it. Because of this slip of tongue, the interviewer had asked for more than ten minutes. The other subjects that had been prepared to show their own level had no chance to talk.

Of course, in the end, the interviewee did not pass.

Therefore, the interviewee, who was interviewed by the interviewer for questioning, was very easy to get out of the way. That is to say, I am sorry. Just now, the slip of the tongue was wrong, and the correct way should be how to solve it.

Don't be embarrassed by vanity, sorry to apologize.

Otherwise, it will be wrong to make mistakes. In the end, we will make ourselves more passive.

How to deal with professional in-depth questioning?

As an interviewee, if you judge the interviewer is asking yourself professionally, you should understand that the interviewer is examining his professional ability, including his professional accuracy and depth.

First, listen clearly and answer again.

We should calm down, do not panic, listen carefully, listen clearly and answer again, be calm and not to rush to answer. This is mental preparation.

Second, the answer should be focused and important.

Do not give an example: if you really want to give an example, you should answer the main points first, then give examples to demonstrate the main points. Don't come up with examples.

The interviewer will not be patient enough to listen to you for example, because the interview time is tight, even if you are a very good manager.

Even if you argue with examples, do not put the example too long, otherwise you will not be able to delay the time, and the interviewer will think that you have not summarized and refined.

Third, ask professional, answer professional, do not go around.

Don't mix professional questions with professional questions.

Fourth, try to use professional terms.

Don't doubt that the interviewer can't understand the technical terms.

Some applicants often reply, "this is a professional question, which you may not understand."

Remember, since the interviewer is sitting in the position of the interviewer, do not doubt that the interviewer is not content with the professional content.

The interviewer may not really understand the profession, but he can tell you whether you know the profession or not.

Otherwise, he will not call the interviewer, especially the interviewer of a famous brand company, even if he is very young.

Please trust the interviewer's ability to judge professional depth.

After answering the professional terms, it can be a metaphor for deepening the understanding of the interviewer, but not at the beginning.

Fifth, summarize the concept of species.

In answering professional questions, we must never mix up different levels of professional problems.

The professional questions on the same level should be answered at the same time.

Do not answer a part without stopping, so the interviewer will think you are not professional enough.

Sixth, the answer should be structured and reasonable.

The so-called structure is a reasonable and solid support for the professional argument you are talking about. Since it is a support, there are at least two supporting points, not more than five.

If there are more than five points, please think again, summarize and summarize the merger.

Moreover, these points must have internal logic and relevance, and are supported by a certain structural sequence.

Seventh, the answer should be in place instead of offside.

The so-called professional questions that are answered are just to support your professional arguments and answer completely and accurately; the so-called offside is not to raise the level of grandchildren to the sub level; the so-called disorderly position is to confuse the structural order of the argument, or to answer the irrelevant content or the content that should not be related.

So, answer the questions in place and wait for the interviewer to ask further questions.

This way you interact with the interviewer, and the interviewer will be excited.

Eighth, there are also professional and exciting content to say, but the interviewer doesn't want to ask what to do.

After answering professional depth questions, the interviewer may have known much about it. He intends to finish questioning professional depth questions, and you are still excited, and want to continue to speak more about professional matters.

What should we do at this time?

At this point, you can ask the interviewer very politely to allow you to speak for another 1 minutes, and then to give an excellent view.

After the interviewer has promised, he can express his most brilliant and unique viewpoint in the shortest possible time.

Remember, if the interviewer stops asking questions, please don't ask for it again.

Ninth, what is wrong with the interviewer's questions?

When you communicate in a professional way, you often encounter a situation: you do not fully understand or understand the questions that the interviewer wants to ask, or you can not find the answers to the questions at the moment, you can use the following methods to answer: "what you asked just now can be understood as...

Meaning? "

This is equivalent to asking the interviewer, so that it is easy to deduce the problems that can not be answered to the content that is conducive to the answer.

This is a great skill.

How to adjust yourself in the face of questioning?

If the interviewee is confronted with a tight fitting style of interviewer, then I tell you that such interviewers are generally very qualified.

Although the experts are not always pressed by step by step, the style of the interviewer must be a master.

Therefore, if you are Mr. Nanguo or the general level, please admit your bad luck and fail to pass the bill. If you really have the ability, tell you, you have met Bo Le.

In reality, many people encounter such an interviewer often nervous, nervous, a nervous idea can not be opened, can not open the answer to disorder, the answer is random, the result is more and more confused, more chaotic, more nervous, eventually chaotic mess.

If you really have a level, the right way to deal with it is:

First, appreciate this interview style from the heart, that is, appreciate the interviewer, do not exclude the interviewer from the heart, mistakenly believe that the interviewer and oneself can not get through.

Second, if your thinking fails to catch up with the interviewer's questioning speed, you can take a deep breath, slow down the speed, avoid the interviewer's eyes, think about 35 seconds, form a clearer answer, and then have a positive exchange with the interviewer.

Such an answer ensures that the answer is accurate, clear and complete, avoids the rush and confusion, and controls the atmosphere of the interview. It slows down the interviewer's questioning speed and prevents the interviewer from getting more anxious.

It also makes the interviewer feel that you are a steady and able person to control the situation, which will give you an extra score for your interview.

Third, if you are a super fast and expressive person, you can always adapt to the interviewer's questioning speed and adjust to the speed that the interviewer can catch up with you, so that the interviewer can feel your thinking faster, and finally force the interviewer to slow down the speed of asking questions.