Who Should Be Responsible For Such A Chain Of Fraud?

According to the world clothing shoes and hats network understanding, heart to mind, and so on for a long time "sea naughty" back in the United States

European milk powder health care products and Korean and Japanese cosmetics may be counterfeit counterfeit goods from illegal domestic businesses such as Putian.

Recently, a courier company colluded with the counterfeiting merchants, counterfeiting the video of counterfeiting the shoes and distributing the videos on the Internet.

Some shoe factories in Putian, Fujian produce counterfeit products.

,

And New Balance sneakers, by courier company "collection point" to provide off-site on-line services, and set up fake overseas logistics inquiry website, help manufacturers forge overseas shipping information, cover up the actual delivery place, for example, originally issued from Putian fake shoes, on the logistics path is displayed from the United States or Hongkong, China, so that the counterfeit goods turned into a foreign purchase genuine products.

So who should be responsible for such a chain of fraud?

The author recently exchanged with many express companies and related insiders, and found that this phenomenon is not a short-term phenomenon, but from underground factory production, e-commerce platform sales, and then to the cattle as intermediaries to collect and dispatch, has formed a complex gray industrial chain.

The "cattle" mentioned here mainly refers to the local "collecting points" which are responsible for the pportation of fake commodities after being aggregated. In the video, the websites of consumers querying logistics path information are built by themselves or with the producers and sellers of fake commodities. Some of them are companies that have long been engaged in cross-border e-commerce business, so there are both genuine and fake goods in their hands, and the conversion of logistics numbers and logistics paths between genuine and fake goods can also be controlled by them.

Of course, cattle do not exclude some of the courier companies in the local "join agent", which is unique to the domestic express industry development mode is closely related.

In China, apart from China Post and Shun Feng, most of the express enterprises that are growing up are expanding rapidly through the franchise system. In these express enterprises, the headquarters is to use the bill of fare as the main source of income.

The larger the number of franchisees, the greater the delivery volume. The more sales orders the headquarters sells, the more revenue will be gained.

In addition, local outlets need to pay a certain pfer fee if they need to pfer their headquarters to pfer centers.

Franchisees from all over the world are responsible for the cost and price of express delivery.

They have to buy their own cars, recruit employees or subcontract their sites.

Therefore, we generally see the express price of consumers is not determined by the headquarters, but the various local outlets to determine their own, franchisees in their own region need to own profits and losses.

Such a development mode has also led some franchisees and even their contractors (probably the cattle above) to join the counterfeiting businesses to help them get more benefits and help them provide false courier routing information and get profit sharing.

In recent years, as several private express giants have been listed, how to standardize their franchisees to maintain the brand and monitor the quality of service has become a top priority for several companies, including the establishment of a "blacklist" of the company's credit system, the establishment of the franchisee's control and punishment regulations, and even binding with the important franchisees through the capital level, or directly into the camp.

Of course, it is unfair to use the "sea scam" board on express companies.

The author and SF EXPRESS, who have been through the direct development of SF EXPRESS, have learned that since 2015, SF has reported to the local law enforcement authorities for 6 times. The government and enterprises have jointly cracked down on the distribution center of counterfeit goods. At the same time, Shun Feng has refused to collect nearly 3 million votes of Putian Anfu market express every year, but the cattle also have a flexible way not to deliver goods from Putian, but to ship them to other places, so that the courier companies are also unable to identify the actual source of orders.

In addition, not only is the logistics path after the sea scouring, but also from overseas shopping tickets to overseas shopping live broadcast, the so-called credentials of "Hai Tao" for consumers to rest assured are fraudulent channels.

The management of counterfeit goods can not be completed by a single enterprise, but requires the whole industry and even the whole society to make joint efforts, especially the strengthening of supervision and punishment in various links. In recent years, the joint fraud of the electronic business platform or express delivery industry has shown that the regulatory means of relevant departments are relatively lagging behind.

In this regard, it is also important to strengthen supervision through legislation.

At the end of last year, the People's Republic of China Electronic Commerce Act (Draft) was first submitted to the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress for deliberation. Among them, it was clearly stated that prohibition of the implementation of information on false credit rating, such as brushes, censorship and bad reviews, could result in a maximum penalty of 500 thousand yuan for offenders.

More interesting reports, please pay attention to the world clothing shoes and hats net.